Constituciones

A Bugal-b’laan Tribal Association, Inc v. Ramos (2004.01.29)

A BUGAL-B’LAAN TRIBAL ASSOCIATION, INC., represented by its Chairman F’LONG MIGUEL M. LUMAYONG, WIGBERTO E. TAÑADA, PONCIANO BENNAGEN, JAIME TADEO, RENATO R. CONSTANTINO, JR., F’LONG AGUSTIN M. DABIE, ROBERTO P. AMLOY, RAQIM L. DABIE, SIMEON H. DOLOJO, IMELDA M. GANDON, LENY B. GUSANAN, MARCELO L. GUSANAN, QUINTOL A. LABUAYAN, LOMINGGES D. LAWAY, BENITA P. TACUAYAN, minors JOLY L. BUGOY, represented by his father UNDERO D. BUGOY, ROGER M. DADING, represented by his father ANTONIO L. DADING, ROMY M. LAGARO, represented by his father TOTING A. LAGARO, MIKENY JONG B.

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Constitution of Bangladesh (selected provisions)

Constitution of Bangladesh

PART III - FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Article 31. Right to protection of law.

To enjoy the protection of the law, and to be treated in accordance with law, and only in accordance with law, is the inalienable right of every citizen, wherever he may be, and of every other person for the time being within Bangladesh, and in particular no action detrimental to the life, liberty, body, reputation or property of any person shall be taken except in accordance with law.

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Suray Prasad Sharma Dhungel v. Godavari Marble Industries and others, WP 35/1992 (1995.10.31)

Supreme Court, Full Bench

Hon`ble Trilok Pratap Rana
Hon`ble Laxman Prasad Aryal
Hon`ble -Gobinda Bahadur Shrestha

Order Writ No. 35 of the year 2049 B.S (1992)

Petitioner: Suray Prasad Sharma Dhungel
Versus Respondents: Godawari Marble Industries and others

Case: Mandamus

Constitutional / Legal Issues

Whether the Constitution guarantees the right to clean: environment as the part of right to life?

Whether there is locus standi of the NGOs or individuals working for the protection of the environment?

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Belize -- Aurelio Cal, et al. v. Attorney General of Belize, Supreme Court of Belize (Claims No. 171 and 172 of 2007) (18 Oct 2007) (Mayan land rights)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007

CONSOLIDATED CLAIMS

CLAIM NO. 171 OF 2007

BETWEEN:

AURELIO CAL in his own behalf and on behalf of the MAYA VILLAGE OF SANTA CRUZ
and
BASILIO TEUL, HIGINIO TEUL, MARCELINA CAL TEUL
and SUSANO CANTI Claimants

AND

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE
and
THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND
ENVIRONMENT Defendants

CLAIM NO. 172 OF 2007

BETWEEN:

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Nepal -- Prakash Mani Sharma v. His Majesty’s Government Cabinet Secretariat and Others, WP 2237/1990 (2003.3.11)

Supreme Court of Nepal, Joint Bench

Hon’ble Arbinda Nath Acharya,
Hon’ble Chandra Prasad Parajuli
WP No 3440 of the year 2053 B.S (1996)

Petitioner: Advocate Prakash Mani Sharma and others

Versus

Respondents: His Majesty’s Government, Cabinet Secretariat and others,

Case: Certiorari with Mandamus

Constitutional/Legal Issues

Is the court entitled to ask the government to adopt particular measures for reducing pollution?

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Comparative Constitutional Language for Environmental Amendments to the Australian Constitution

Comparative Constitutional Language for Environmental Amendments to the Australian Constitution

Compiled by

Don Anton, Policy Officer
Environmental Defender`s Office Ltd.
Level 9, 89 York Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Tel: +61 2 9262 6989
Fax: +61 2 92626998
Email: danton@magna.com.au

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

India -- Perumatty Grama Panchayat vs State of Kerala (2003.12.16) (Coca-Cola groundwater exploitation case)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AT ERNAKULAM
W.P.(C) No. 34292 of 2003.
Dated this the 16th December, 2003.

Perumatty Grama Panchayat

Vs

State of Kerala .

REPORTED IN 2004 (1) KLT 731.

JUDGMENT

K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.

1. The point that arises for consideration in this case in whether a Grama Panchayat can cancel the licence of a factory manufacturing non-alcoholic beverages on the ground of excessive exploitation of ground water. The brief facts of the case are the following:- .

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Nepal -- Advocate Prakash Mani Sharma for Pro Public vs His Majesty Government Cabinet Secretariat and others, WP 2991/1995 (1997.06.09)

(Translation from Nepali to English by Raju Prasad Chapagai)

Advocate Prakash Mani Sharma for Pro Public vs His Majesty Government Cabinet Secretariat and others, WP 2991/1995 (1997.06.09)

Supreme Court of Nepal, Joint Bench

Hon’ble Keshab Prasad Upadhayay,
Hon’ble Kedar Nath Acharya,

WP No 2991of the year 2052 B.S (1995)

Petitioner: Advocate Prakash Mani Sharma for Pro Public

Versus

Respondents: His Majesty Government Cabinet Secretariat and others

Countries and Regions:
Resource Type:
Resource Topic:

Pages

Subscribe to Constituciones