Sudamerica

Sentence C-035/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia (Alberto Castilla et al v. Colombia)

*SPANISH BELOW*

Sentence C-035/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia (Alberto Castilla et al v. Colombia):

Citizens presented constitutional claims against several provisions of the laws that approved the 2010-2014 National Development Plan (Law 1450 of 2011) and the 2014-2018 National Development Plan (Law 1753 of 2015).  

Undefined

Victory for Environmental Defenders and Democracy in Latin America

3/12/18
ELAW Bulletin

After a 6-year negotiation process, 24 Latin American and Caribbean countries have adopted a regional agreement to ensure access to information, participation, and justice in environmental matters. Upon entering into force, the agreement will include the first ever legally binding provisions to protect environmental defenders from threats and attacks.

Rol No. 55.203-2016 (Mina Invierno case), Supreme Court of Chile (2017)

A mining company (Mina Invierno) proposed a project to incorporate blasting methods at an existing permitted open pit coal mine in southern Chile.  Citizens and civil society organizations properly presented petitions for the provision of citizen participation procedures during the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process required for this proposed complementary project, but those petitions were denied.  The denial of those petitions was unsuccessfully appealed at the administrative level and the proposed project to incorporate blasting was approved, so a constitutional lawsuit (re

Undefined

Sindicato de Trabajadores Independientes Procesadoras de Productos del Mar del Borde Costero Caleta Lo Rojas y otros c/ Central Termoeléctrica Bocamina I y II de ENDESA Chile S.A

Sindicato de Trabajadores Independientes Procesadoras de Productos del Mar del Borde Costero Caleta Lo Rojas y otros c/ Central Termoeléctrica Bocamina I y II de ENDESA Chile S. A., Rol No. 9852-2013, Supreme Court of Chile (2014) (decided on 9 January 2014, revised 6 November 2014): 

https://microjuriscl.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/mjch_mjj36617.pdf

 

Undefined

Kansol S.A. y Roswell Company S.A. c/ La Ley No. 5194

Kansol S.A. y Roswell Company S.A. c/ La Ley No. 5194 Que Declara de Interest Social y Expropria a Favor del Institute Paraguayo del Indigena (INDI), Año 2014 No, 797
Corte Suprema de Paraguay

La Ley 5194/14 (promulgada el 11 de junio del 2014) expropió tierra de los accionantes para otorgársela a una comunidad indígena (Comunidad Indígena Sawhoyamaxa del Pueblo Enxet).  Los accionantes (Kansol S.A. y Roswell Company S.A.) son inversionistas extranjeros que presentó esta acción de inconstitucionalidad para impugnar la constitucionalidad de la Ley 5194/14. 

Spanish

Pages

Subscribe to Sudamerica