right to life
Forum, Prevention of Envn. & Sound Pollution v. Union of India, CA 3735/2005 (2005.10.28)
Civil Appeal No. 3735 of 2005
{Against the judgment of the Kerala High Court reported in 2004 (1) KLT 134 : ILR 2003 (3) Kerala 424}
Forum, Prevention of Envn. & Sound Pollution
Versus
Union of India and Another
R.C. Lahoti, CJI.
India -- L. Krishnan v. State of Tamil Nadu, W.P.No.20186 of 2000 (27/06/2005) (Encroachments on Odai Poromboke natural water storage)
For a properly formatted copy of the document please click on the Microsoft Word link above
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 27/06/2005
Coram
The Hon`ble Mr.MARKANDEY KATJU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
W.P.No.20186 of 2000
and
W.P.M.P.No.29342 of 2000
L. Krishnan ... Petitioner
-Vs-
India -- K.M. Chinnappa v. Union of India W.P. 202/1995(2002.10.30)(Mining in Forest Land)
K.M. Chinnappa, T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad
v.
Union of India
Writ Petition No. 202 of 1995
30.10.2002 dd.
CJI, Y.K. Sabharwal & Arijit Pasayat
Judgement
India -- Attakoya Thangal v. Union of India W.P. (Right to clean water as a right to life)
Kerala High Court
Attakoya Thangal
v.
Union of India
Sankaran Nair, J.
Judgement:
1. The conflict in these cases, is the conflict of yesterdays and a new day – the conflict of the lifestyle of a lotus eyed leisurely day gone by, and the exacting demands of today on material resources.
India -- D.D. Vyas v. Ghaziabad Development Authority (Adu Park)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
D.D. VYAS & OTHERS
V.
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, GHAZIABAD & ANOTHER
OM PRAKASH AND M. KANTJU JJ.
Om Prakash, J. :-
Bangladesh -- Farooque v. Government of Bangladesh WP 891 of 1994 (2001.07.15) (Industrial Pollution Case)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
WRIT PETITION NO. 891 OF 1994 In the matter of: An application under Article 102(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
- And -
In the matter of: Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque, Secretary General, Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA) being dead Ms. Syeda Rizwana Hasan, Director (Program), representing Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA).... Petitioner
- Versus -
India -- M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, WP 182/1996 (2000.05.12) (Beas River Case: )
M. C. Mehta
v.
Kamal Nath and Others
Writ Petition (C) No. 182 of 1996
[S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J.]
12.05.2000
ORDER
This case, which was finally decided by this Court by its judgment dated December 13, 1996 has been placed before us for determination of the quantum of pollution fine. It may be stated that the main case was disposed of with the following directions:
1. The public trust doctrine, as discussed by us in this judgment is a part of the law of the land.
Bangladesh -- Nurul Islam v. Government of Bangladesh, WP 1825 of 1999 (2000.02.07) (Tobacco Advertising Case)
High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Mohammad Fazlul Karim and Md. Abdud Wahhab Miah, JJ
Writ Petition No. 1825 of 1999
with
Writ Petition No. 4521 of 1999
Professor Nurul Islam
............... Petitioners
in W. P. No. 1825/99
Mr. Alhaj Nur Mohammad and others
....... Petitioners
in both the Writ Petitioners
Date of Judgment : The 7th February, 2000
Result : Both the Rule absolute with directions
Judgment
Bangladesh -- Farooque vs Government of Bangladesh, WP 92 of 1996 (1996.07.01) (Radioactive Milk Powder Case)
Dr Mohiuddin Farooque
vs
Secretary, Ministry of Commerce,
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and Others
Reported in: The South Asian Environmental Law Reporter Vol. 3 (4) Dec 1996
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Writ Petition No. 92 of 1996
Before: Kazi Ebadul Hoque, J.
Amirul Kabir Chodhury, J.
Argued: 18 and 19 June 1996.
Decided: 1 July 1996
India -- F.K. Hussain v. Union of India, O.P. 2741/1988 (1990.02.26)(Right to Potable Water as part of a Right to Life)
F.K. Hussain, Petitioner
v.
Union of India and others, Respondents.
O.P. 2741 of 1988
26-2-1990
CHETTUR SANKARAN NAIR, J.
ORDER :-
1. The conflict in these cases, is the conflict of yesterdays and a new day the conflict of the lifestyle of a lotuseyed leisurely day gone by and the exacting demands of today on material resources.

